Discussion:
[protege-user] An ontology for contracts
Jang-Vijay Singh
2018-11-27 23:28:02 UTC
Permalink
Hello everyone,

Thank you again for answering some of my questions in the past.

Does anyone know a good and comprehensive ontology for contracts that could
be reused.
Something that defines concepts like clause, predicate, ... or rights,
obligations, prohibitions in a manner that could be reasoned upon (and, as
I visualise it, could be linked to other ontologies from legislation?)

Thought of checking if something was already available for contracts.

I have seen V. Kabilan's (2003) paper describing a class model for
contracts but no accompanying (OWL) ontology. There doesn't seem to be
anything more recent and generic enough.

Best Regards,
Jang-Vijay
Ghislain ATEMEZING
2018-11-28 13:31:05 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
See this Public Procurement Contract at
http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc.html
You can also "go shopping" here [1].

HTH
Ghislain
[1] https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
Post by Jang-Vijay Singh
Hello everyone,
Thank you again for answering some of my questions in the past.
Does anyone know a good and comprehensive ontology for contracts that
could be reused.
Something that defines concepts like clause, predicate, ... or rights,
obligations, prohibitions in a manner that could be reasoned upon (and, as
I visualise it, could be linked to other ontologies from legislation?)
Thought of checking if something was already available for contracts.
I have seen V. Kabilan's (2003) paper describing a class model for
contracts but no accompanying (OWL) ontology. There doesn't seem to be
anything more recent and generic enough.
Best Regards,
Jang-Vijay
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
--
"*Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none*" (W. Shakespeare)
Web: http://atemezing.org
Dr M.A. Message
2018-11-28 14:22:54 UTC
Permalink
Good Afternoon,

https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts

Blocked by Malwarebytes

MM
Post by Ghislain ATEMEZING
Hi,
See this Public Procurement Contract at
http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc.html [2]
You can also "go shopping" here [1].
HTH
Ghislain
[1]
https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
[3]
Post by Jang-Vijay Singh
Hello everyone,
Thank you again for answering some of my questions in the past.
Does anyone know a good and comprehensive ontology for contracts
that could be reused.
Something that defines concepts like clause, predicate, ... or
rights, obligations, prohibitions in a manner that could be reasoned
upon (and, as I visualise it, could be linked to other ontologies
from legislation?)
Thought of checking if something was already available for
contracts.
I have seen V. Kabilan's (2003) paper describing a class model for
contracts but no accompanying (OWL) ontology. There doesn't seem to
be anything more recent and generic enough.
Best Regards,
Jang-Vijay
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user [1]
--
"LOVE ALL, TRUST A FEW, DO WRONG TO NONE" (W. Shakespeare)
Web: http://atemezing.org [4]
------
[1] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
[2] http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc.html
[3]
https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
[4] http://atemezing.org
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Ghislain ATEMEZING
2018-11-28 14:33:22 UTC
Permalink
re Malwarebytes issue
Well, you can configure to bypass by domain name or website [1]
HTH

[1] https://support.malwarebytes.com/docs/DOC-1061
Post by Dr M.A. Message
Good Afternoon,
https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
Blocked by Malwarebytes
MM
Post by Ghislain ATEMEZING
Hi,
See this Public Procurement Contract at
http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc.html [2]
You can also "go shopping" here [1].
HTH
Ghislain
[1]
https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
[3]
Post by Jang-Vijay Singh
Hello everyone,
Thank you again for answering some of my questions in the past.
Does anyone know a good and comprehensive ontology for contracts
that could be reused.
Something that defines concepts like clause, predicate, ... or
rights, obligations, prohibitions in a manner that could be reasoned
upon (and, as I visualise it, could be linked to other ontologies
from legislation?)
Thought of checking if something was already available for
contracts.
I have seen V. Kabilan's (2003) paper describing a class model for
contracts but no accompanying (OWL) ontology. There doesn't seem to
be anything more recent and generic enough.
Best Regards,
Jang-Vijay
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user [1]
--
"LOVE ALL, TRUST A FEW, DO WRONG TO NONE" (W. Shakespeare)
Web: http://atemezing.org [4]
------
[1] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
[2] http://contsem.unizar.es/def/sector-publico/pproc.html
[3]
https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/terms?q=Contract&tag=Contracts
[4] http://atemezing.org
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
--
"*Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none*" (W. Shakespeare)
Web: http://atemezing.org
Loading...